Kp. Koo et Rc. Thirlby, LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS - WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL TIMING FOR OPERATION, Archives of surgery, 131(5), 1996, pp. 540-544
Objective: To review the results of laparoscopic:cholecystectomy (LC)
in patients with acute cholecystitis with attention to cost and clinic
al outcome. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Large private metrop
olitan teaching hospital. Patients: Four hundred forty-six patients ha
d LCs at our institution between January 1993 and February 1995. Acute
cholecystitis, confirmed by clinical, laboratory, operative, and hist
opathological findings, was present in 60 patients. Main Outcome Measu
res: The medical history, laboratory findings, gallbladder ultrasounds
, timing of operation from the onset of symptoms, conversion rates to
open procedures, operative times, intraoperative findings, complicatio
ns, postoperative length of stay, cost of operative procedures and hos
pitalizations, and convalescence times were collected. Results: Laparo
scopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 16 patients within 72 hours of
the onset of symptoms of acute cholecystitis (group 1), in 19 patient
s with symptoms between 4 and 7 days (group 2), and in 25 patients wit
h symptoms lasting more than 7 days (group 3). The only factor (eg, pr
eoperative laboratory and ultrasound findings) that affected the outco
me of the operation was duration of symptoms prior to operation. Patie
nts who had LC done within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms had lower
rates of conversion to open procedures, less difficult operations, sh
orter operative times, less costly procedures, and a shorter convalesc
ence than those with symptoms for longer than 72 hours prior to operat
ion. The conversion rates in patients operated within and after 72 hou
rs were 12% and 30%, respectively. There were no bile duct injuries an
d no mortalities. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be per
formed safely in most patients with acute cholelithiasis. However, we
found that the duration of symptoms prior to LC affected the outcome;
the conversion rates, hospital costs, and convalescence times increase
d in operated-on patients with symptoms for more than 72 hours. In our
opinion, interval cholecystectomy may be a superior option in this la
tter group of patients.