P. Augstein et al., COMPARISON OF THE ISLET-CELL ANTIBODY PATTERN OF MONOCLONAL GLUTAMIC-ACID DECARBOXYLASE ANTIBODIES RECOGNIZING LINEAR AND CONFORMATIONAL EPITOPES, Acta histochemica, 98(2), 1996, pp. 229-241
In order to compare the reactivity of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD
) antibodies recognizing linear and conformational epitopes as islet c
ell cytoplasmic antibodies (ICA), monoclonal antibodies were generated
. An ELISA displacement test using two biotinylated monoclonals recogn
izing a linear (M61/7E11) or a conformational GAD65 epitope (M65/6B12)
was performed to identify epitope regions recognized by monoclonal GA
D antibodies. The GAD binding by monoclonal GAD antibodies was tested
by immunofluorescence on fixed and unfixed pancreatic sections of huma
n, rat, and mouse, and by Dot-blot experiments. 16/23 (69.6%) of the m
onoclonals were specifically reactive with GAD65 and 7/23 (30.4%) were
reactive with both GAD isoforms. 8/16 (50%) of monoclonal GAD65 antib
odies recognized a linear GAD epitope located at the N-terminus (patte
rn 1). 5/16 (31.3%) displaced M65/6B12, indicating the recognition of
a conformational GAD epitope (pattern 2). Monoclonals belonging to pat
terns 1 and 2 showed strong ICA binding. 3/16 (18.8%) of monoclonals s
pecific for GAD65 with weak or no immunostaining of pancreatic islets
(pattern 3) did not inhibit the binding of both biotinylated antibodie
s in the displacement test, indicating other epitope specificities. In
conclusion, GAD antibodies recognizing both conformational and linear
epitopes of the GAD65 molecule are involved in ICA binding with stron
g reactivity. Furthermore, results obtained with monoclonals of patter
n 3 suggest the occurrence of GAD65 epitopes partly inaccessible on cr
yosections, which may result in an ICA-negative test of GAD65 autoanti
body positive sera.