This paper addresses the apparent conflict between the results of expe
riments on individual choice and judgement and the results of market e
xperiments. Data are reported for experiments designed to analyze the
effects of (a) economic incentives, repetition, feedback and informati
on and (b) choice and valuation response modes on (c) subjects' decisi
ons in paired market and nonmarket environments. Causes of divergent m
arket and nonmarket behavior are identified in the context of the pref
erence reversal phenomenon (PRP). Study of the PRP is extended to two
types of market environments. The PRP is observed on the first repetit
ion in a market setting (second price auction) with immediate feedback
, both with and without financial incentives. However, after five repe
titions of the auction, the subjects' bids are generally consistent wi
th their choices and the asymmetry between the rates of predicted and
unpredicted reversals disappears. An individual pricing task using the
BDM mechanism yields similar results on the first repetition but resu
lts which differ from the second price auction on the fifth repetition
. Choice tasks produce lower rates of reversals than do pricing tasks
in both market and individual decision making settings.