This article describes the results of an in-depth interview study of A
rab elites in the wake of the Gulf war research that only partially su
pports a crucial finding of research on actor-observer differences in
social attribution. Although the aggregated explanations of these Arab
respondents were consistent with the predictions of the theory, the a
ttributions of iraq's behavior by Egyptian elites, and attributions of
the Coalition's behavior by Moroccan and Tunisian elites were not ful
ly consistent with the hypothesis. These results were interpreted to s
uggest the importance of distinguishing, in applications of attributio
n theory, between complex political situations and simple social situa
tions, the perspective of actors versus observers, and cultural differ
ences in discursive practices.