R. Bonacci et al., RELEVANCE OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY IN MALIGNANT, BENIGN AND SURROUNDING NORMAL THYROID-TISSUE, Journal of endocrinological investigation, 19(3), 1996, pp. 159-164
Several authors have demonstrated the presence of estrogen receptors (
ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) in thyroid tissue, generally using
dextran coated charcoal method (DCCA). The aim of this study was to m
easure ER and PR in thyroid specimens using an immunoenzymatic method,
and to evaluate the meaning of different prevalence of ER and PR in m
alignant and benign thyroid disease, as compared with normal thyroid t
issue. We have measured ER and PR in thyroid tissue from 28 benign and
20 malignant thyroid lesions, and in 38 samples of surrounding normal
thyroid tissues. The sensitivity of ER-EIA and PR-EIA was 1.0 and 1.5
fmol/mg protein, respectively. In thyroid carcinoma the frequency of
ER positivity (ER+) was 7/20 (35%); it was significantly higher in the
surrounding normal tissue (15/20;71%) (p=0.03). In benign thyroid dis
ease, the prevalence of ER+ was 11/28 (39%) and in the surrounding nor
mal tissue it was 11/18 (61%) (p-not significant), PR+ was detected in
7/20 (35%) thyroid cancers and in 15/28 (53%) benign lesions without
significant difference with the frequency detected in the surrounding
normal tissues. ER and PR concentrations (mean+/-SD) in thyroid cancer
was 2.2+/-2.2 and 2.2+/-2.9 respectively, similarly to that detected
in benign thyroid disease and in normal tissue. The simultaneous prese
nce of ER and PR (ER+PR+) was also evaluated. We have found that the f
requency of ER+ PR+ was significantly higher in benign lesions (8/28;
28.6%) as compared with malignant samples (1/20; 5%) (p<0.05); the fre
quency of ER+PR+ was significantly higher in normal tissue surrounding
the malignant lesions (9/20;45) (p=0.003), Our data indicate i) EIA m
ethod is appropriate to detect ER and PR in thyroid tissue. ii) The fr
equency of ER+ and ER+PR+ specimens is significantly higher in normal
thyroid tissue than in pathologic tissues. This indicates that ER and
PR immunoassays may be useful tools to evaluate the normal biological
activity of thyroid cells.