M. Zehetmayer et al., TOPICAL VERSUS PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA IN CLEAR CORNEAL CATARACT-SURGERY, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 22(4), 1996, pp. 480-484
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternat
ive to peribulbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery. Settin
g: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria. Methods
: In this prospective, double-blind clinical trial, 36 patients had bi
lateral cataract surgeries performed from 1 to 3 months apart. Half of
the patients had topical anesthesia for the first surgery and peribul
bar anesthesia for the second surgery. The other half had peribulbar f
irst and then topical, All surgery was done using a temporal clear cor
neal approach and bimanual phacoemulsification followed by in-the-bag
intraocular lens implantation. Subjective pain was assessed using a vi
sual analog scale of no pain (0%) to worst pain imaginable (100%) and
intraoperative motility using a rank scale of adverse motility (-5) to
ideal patient cooperation (+5). Results: Subjective pain was comparab
le whether topical or peribulbar anesthesia was used (mean 10.75 versu
s 10.97%; P > .6). Patient cooperation (motility) was significantly be
tter when topical anesthesia was used (+2.16 versus +1.11; P = .03). T
here were no significant differences in complications. A peribulbar bl
ock was given in addition to the topical anesthesia in two cases. Conc
lusions: Topical anesthesia is a safe, effective alternative to peribu
lbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery.