D. Gronemeyer et al., EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION AND PROCEDURES - PREFERENCES FOR INTERVENTIONAL MICROTHERAPY, Journal of digital imaging, 9(2), 1996, pp. 81-96
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, and electron be
am tomography scanners are built for radiologic diagnosis. With increa
sing frequency they are being used in the field of Interventional Micr
otherapy to permit transparent visualization of the therapeutic field.
Each of these scanners can be combined with endoscopy, fluoroscopy/di
gital subtraction angiography, and ultrasound units for hybrid imaging
techniques as well as with therapeutic systems like lasers or radiofr
equency. MRI affords 3D localization without x-ray exposure. Open acce
ss and keyhole imaging allow nearly real time guidance of instruments.
Minimally invasive techniques using endoscopes and hybrid tomographic
guidance result in improved tip tracking of microinstruments and redu
ced complications. This safer access into the body will lead to interd
isciplinary cooperation with the potential for large cost reductions.
This report summarizes our experience regarding which of the hybrid im
aging suites is best suited for procedures including among others drug
instillations, prosthesis (stent) implantation, or microoperations (e
ndoscopic diskectomy/sequestrectomy), and physiological measurements s
imultaneously. (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company