Ma. Meredith et Be. Stein, SPATIAL DETERMINANTS OF MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION IN CAT SUPERIOR COLLICULUS NEURONS, Journal of neurophysiology, 75(5), 1996, pp. 1843-1857
1. Although a representation of multisensory space is contained in the
superior colliculus, little is known about the spatial requirements o
f multisensory stimuli that influence the activity of neurons here. Cr
itical to this problem is an assessment of the registry of the differe
nt receptive fields within individual multisensory neurons. The presen
t study was initiated to determine how closely the receptive fields of
individual multisensory neurons are aligned, the physiological role o
f that alignment, and the possible functional consequences of inducing
receptive-field misalignment. 2. Individual multisensory neurons in t
he superior colliculus of anesthetized, paralyzed cats were studied wi
th the use of standard extracellular recording techniques. The recepti
ve fields of multisensory neurons: were large, as reported previously,
but exhibited a surprisingly high degree of spatial coincidence. The
average proportion of receptive-field overlap was 86% for the populati
on of visual-auditory neurons sampled. 3. Because of this high degree
of intersensory receptive-field correspondence, combined-modality stim
uli that were coincident in space tended to fall within the excitatory
regions of the receptive fields involved. The result was a significan
tly enhanced neuronal response in 88% of the multisensory neurons stud
ied. If stimuli were spatially disparate, so that one fell outside its
receptive field, either a decreased response occurred (56%), or no in
tersensory effect was apparent (44%). 4. The normal alignment of the d
ifferent receptive fields of a multisensory neuron could be disrupted
by passively displacing the eyes, pinnae, or limbs/body. In no case wa
s a shift in location or size observed in a neuron's other receptive f
ield(s) to compensate for this displacement. The physiological result
of receptive-field misalignment was predictable and based on the locat
ion of the stimuli relative to the new positions of their respective r
eceptive fields. Now, for example, one component of a spatially coinci
dent pair of stimuli might fall outside its receptive field and inhibi
t the other's effects. 5. These data underscore the dependence of mult
isensory integrative responses on the relationship of the different st
imuli to their corresponding receptive fields rather than to the spati
al relationship of the stimuli to one another. Apparently, the alignme
nt of different receptive fields for individual multisensory neurons e
nsures that responses to combinations of stimuli derived from the same
event are integrated to increase the salience of that event. Therefor
e the maintenance of receptive-field alignment is critical for the app
ropriate integration of converging sensory signals and, ultimately, el
icitation of adaptive behaviors.