Objective: To determine when a difference in FEV(1) is sufficiently la
rge to be associated with a noticeable difference in dyspnea symptoms
for patients with chronic lung disease. Design: Cross-sectional analys
is of 15 groups (n=112 patients, 832 contrasts).Setting: Respiratory r
ehabilitation program. Patients: Patients with COPD (mean FEV(1)=35% p
redicted). Measures: Patients' perspectives assessed through subjectiv
e comparison ratings of dyspnea and of overall health. Relation betwee
n the FEV(1) and patients' perspectives determined the smallest differ
ence in spirometry that was associated with a noticeable difference in
patients' symptoms. Results: The FEV(1) was moderately correlated wit
h patients' ratings of dyspnea (r=0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI),
0.22 to 0.35). In contrast, the FEV(1) was minimally con,elated with p
atients' ratings of overall health (r=0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.17). The
FEV(1) needed to differ by 4% predicted for the average patient to st
op rating his or her dyspnea as ''about the same'' and start rating hi
s or her dyspnea as either ''a little bit better'' or ''a little bit w
orse'' relative to other patients (95% CI, 1.5 to 6.5), This was equiv
alent to the average patient's FEV(1) increasing by 112 mL (starting f
rom 975 mL and ending at 1,087 mL). Conclusions: Some statistically si
gnificant differences in the FEV(1) are so small that they may not rep
resent important differences in symptoms for the average patient with
severe COPD; an awareness of the smallest difference in FEV(1) that is
noticeable to patients can help clinicians interpret the effectivenes
s of symptomatic treatments.