BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL USE OF INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY FOR MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION - COMPARISON OF EXTUBATION OUTCOME AND DURATION OF HOSPITAL STAY
P. Knapik et al., BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL USE OF INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY FOR MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION - COMPARISON OF EXTUBATION OUTCOME AND DURATION OF HOSPITAL STAY, Chest, 109(5), 1996, pp. 1231-1233
The left internal thoracic artery is usually used as arterial conduit
for myocardial revascularization; however, there is an increasing popu
larity of bilateral use of this artery for grafting. We examined 180 p
atients with both types of arterial conduits to answer whether bilater
al use of the internal thoracic artery makes the difference in postope
rative extubation outcome and duration of hospital stay in comparison
to the unilateral use of this conduit, Ninety-three patients with bila
teral conduit and 87 patients with unilateral conduit, with comparable
age, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp time have been st
udied, On tire basis of statistical and retrospective analysis, we con
clude that bilateral use of internal thoracic artery for myocardial re
vascularization prolongs required postoperative respiratory support (1
2.0 h against 7.6 h) not affecting the duration of the mean hospital s
tay.