Fa. Lederle, RISK OF RUPTURE OF LARGE ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS - DISAGREEMENT AMONG VASCULAR SURGEONS, Archives of internal medicine, 156(9), 1996, pp. 1007-1009
Background: Many patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who
are cared for by internists are not good candidates for surgery. Elect
ive repair is usually deferred in these patients until the AAA reaches
a diameter at which the estimated risk of rupture is believed to outw
eigh the operative risk. The risk of rupture is usually estimated by a
consulting vascular surgeon, but whether these estimates are well-sup
ported or consistent has not previously been assessed. Objective: To d
etermine the agreement among vascular surgeons about the risk of ruptu
re of large AAAs. Methods: All individual members of the Society for V
ascular Surgery (Manchester, Mass) residing in the United States were
mailed a survey asking for their estimates of the likelihood of ruptur
e of large AAAs. Results: The response rate was 66% and the 257 respon
dents who reported that they were practicing vascular surgeons constit
ute the study group. The median estimates of the 1-year risk of ruptur
e were 20% for 6.5-cm AAAs and 30% for 7.5-cm AAAs, with one third of
respondents estimating 50% or greater risk of rupture for 7.5-cm AAAs
and nearly one third estimating 30% or greater risk of rupture for 6.5
-cm AAAs. The responses spanned a wide range and were generally much h
igher than would be expected based on published data and estimates. Co
nclusions: This survey demonstrates profound disagreement among vascul
ar surgeons about the risk of rupture of large AAAs, reflecting a lack
of pertinent published data. Better data are necessary and are being
collected.