G. Audibert et al., PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ANEURYSMAL SU BARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE - CURRENT PRACTICES IN 32 CENTERS, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 15(3), 1996, pp. 338-341
Objective: To assess the current practices in anaesthesia and intensiv
e care in patients experiencing subarachnoid haemorrhage(SAH). Study d
esign: Analysis of questionnaire sent to the members of the French spe
aking Association of neuroanesthesia and intensive care. Methods: The
survey, performed in the summer of 1995, included questions on the com
position of the neuroanesthesia team, anaesthesia, as well as medical
and surgical treatments. Results: Twenty-nine French and three non Fre
nch centers answered the questionnaire. In 14 centers, more than 60 SA
H had been treated in the previous year. Angiography was performed und
er sedation with a benzodiazepine associated with an opioid (54%). Cri
teria for choosing an endovascular approach were the site of the aneur
ysm (81%), its neck size (42%) and the underlying disease (42%). Anaes
thesia was induced with either propofol (60%) or thiopentone (40%) ass
ociated with an opioid and a muscle relaxant. It was maintained with e
ither isoflurane (59%) or propofol (41%). Nitrous oxide was often asso
ciated (62%). During anaesthesia, nimodipine (84%), mannitol (69%), an
ticonvulsants (47%), dopamine (31%) and lidocaine (9%) were also admin
istered. Postoperatively, nimodipine was administered for prophylaxis
of vasospasm (97%) and transcranial Doppler was employed to diagnose v
asospasm (50%). Other techniques of care included hypervolaemia (89%),
controlled arterial hypertension (36%) and haemodilution (36%).