The behavior of nonliving and living systems is generally viewed as be
ing qualitatively different. The key difference is often summarized by
saying that whereas living systems are complex, nonliving ones are si
mple. This distinction is often the basis for claiming essential diffe
rences in conceptual stances, methods, and theories between scientific
fields. I argue first that nonliving systems can display the unpredic
table, irreducible, irreversible, and emergent-in sum, complex-propert
ies of living systems. Then I discuss an emerging field called complex
ity theory, the principles of which offer the promise of bringing quan
titative unity to an enormous range of phenomena, living or dead.