Ma. Roy et al., ACCURACIES AND INACCURACIES OF THE FAMILY HISTORY METHOD - A MULTIVARIATE APPROACH, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 93(4), 1996, pp. 224-234
This paper reports on 1459 first-degree relatives of probands with sch
izophrenia or affective illness and matched community controls. We sou
ght (i) to validate psychiatric diagnoses obtained by family history (
FH) against those obtained by a best estimate (BE) procedure based on
personal interview and (ii) to explore the factors influencing the acc
uracy of the FH report. We found relatively poor agreement between the
FH and BE diagnoses, and the disagreements were influenced by numerou
s factors, including gender, psychiatric status of the informant or pr
oband's diagnosis. When validated against a BE diagnosis, the overall
accuracy of the FH method is relatively poor, and is furthermore subje
ct to several biases. Therefore, substituting the FH method for BE dia
gnosis may be an important source of error in the investigation of fam
ilial/genetic factors in psychiatric disorders.