G. Sorensen et al., DOUBLE JEOPARDY - WORKPLACE HAZARDS AND BEHAVIORAL RISKS FOR CRAFTSPERSONS AND LABORERS, American journal of health promotion, 10(5), 1996, pp. 355-363
Purpose. To address three specific questions in a sample of craftspers
ons and laborers: (1) Do craftspersons and laborers exposed to workpla
ce hazards have higher behavioral risks, such as smoking and high-fat
diets, than those with few job risks? (2) Compared to workers with few
job risks, do workers exposed to risks on the job have higher intenti
ons to reduce their behavioral risks? (3) Does concern about the level
of exposure to risks on the job increase workers' intentions to reduc
e behavioral risks? Design. A cross-sectional self-administered survey
was conducted in participating worksites. Setting. Twenty-two predomi
nantly manufacturing worksites in Massachusetts. Subjects. Craftsperso
ns and laborers responding to the survey and employed in these 22 work
sites (completion rate = 61%, N = 1841). Measures. By using standardiz
ed items, this survey measured self-reported exposure to workplace haz
ards, concern about job exposures, smoking status, fat and fiber intak
e, readiness to quit smoking, plans to reduce fat intake, plans to eat
more fruits and vegetables, and sociodemographic variables. Results.
Workers reporting exposure to chemical hazards on the job were signifi
cantly more likely to be smokers than were unexposed workers, even whe
n results were controlled for gender. Compared with unexposed workers,
smokers exposed to chemical hazards were significantly more likely to
be thinking of quitting or taking action to quit, when results were c
ontrolled for gender, race, and education. Among workers exposed to oc
cupational chemical hazards, concern about this exposure was significa
ntly associated with intentions to decrease fat intake and increase fr
uit and vegetable intake, and, among men, intentions to quit smoking.
Conclusions. Efforts aimed at integrating health promotion and health
protection are needed to address simultaneously the job risks and pers
onal risks these workers face.