AN AUDIT OF EARLY WOUND-INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY

Citation
Aj. Kelly et al., AN AUDIT OF EARLY WOUND-INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 41(2), 1996, pp. 129-131
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00358835
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
129 - 131
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8835(1996)41:2<129:AAOEWA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The incidence of early post-operative wound infection was studied pros pectively in 1053 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic procedures over a 3-month period. The study was repeated in 1131 patients a year later, 6 months after the hospital had moved to new premises. A clinic al definition of wound infection identified disturbingly high sepsis r ates. A total of 44% of all infections occurred after discharge from h ospital. Despite the large sample, there was no significant difference in the rate of early wound infection between the two periods (7.85 an d 6.82%). There was no significant difference in infection rates betwe en theatres with and without laminar air flow. In the majority (35 out of 53) of minor infections, bacteriological confirmation was not avai lable because no microbiological specimens were received. Conversely, there were five negative swabs out of 16 wounds defined clinically as major infections. We conclude that, where the rate of bacteriological confirmation of wound infection is low, the use of a clinical definiti on gives higher audited sepsis rates. Large audit samples are required to demonstrate differences as a result of a changed practice.