''Defensive medicine'' is a potentially serious social problem: if fea
r of liability drives health care providers to administer treatments t
hat do not have worthwhile medical benefits, then the current liabilit
y system may generate inefficiencies much larger than the costs of com
pensating malpractice claimants. To obtain direct empirical evidence o
n this question, we analyze the effects of malpractice liability refor
ms using data on all elderly Medicare beneficiaries treated fbr seriou
s heart disease in 1984, 1987, and 1990. We find that malpractice refo
rms that directly reduce provider liability pressure lead to reduction
s of 5 to 9 percent in medical expenditures without substantial effect
s on mortality or medical complications. We conclude that liability re
forms can reduce defensive medical practices.