An experimental vaccine consisting of five DNA plasmids expressing dif
ferent combinations and forms of simian immunodeficiency virus-macaque
(SIVmac) proteins has been evaluated for the ability to protect again
st a highly pathogenic uncloned SIVmac251 challenge. One vaccine plasm
id encoded nonreplicating SIVmac239 virus particles. The other four pl
asmids encoded secreted forms of the envelope glycoproteins of two T-c
ell-tropic relatives (SIVmac239 and SIVmac251) and one monocyte/macrop
hage-tropic relative (SIVmac316) of the uncloned challenge virus. Rhes
us macaques were inoculated with DNA at 1 and 3, 11 and 13, and 21 and
25 weeks. Four macaques were inoculated intravenously, intramuscularl
y, and by gene gun inoculations. Three received only gene gun inoculat
ions. Two control monkeys were inoculated with control plasmids by all
three routes of inoculation. Neutralizing antibody titers of 1:216 to
1:768 were present in all of the vaccinated monkeys after the second
cluster of inoculations. These titers were transient, were not boosted
by the third cluster of inoculations, and had fallen to 1:24 to 1:72
by the time of challenge. Cytotoxic T-cell activity for Env was also r
aised in all of the vaccinated animals. The temporal appearance of cyt
otoxic T cells was similar to that of antibody. However, while antibod
y responses fell with time, cytotoxic T-cell responses persisted. The
SIVmac251 challenge was administered intravenously at 2 weeks followin
g the last immunization. The DNA immunizations did not prevent infecti
on or protect against CD4(+) cell loss. Long-term chronic levels of in
fection were similar in the vaccinated and control animals, with 1 in
10,000 to 1 in 100,000 peripheral blood cells carrying infectious viru
s. However, viral loads were reduced to the chronic level over a short
er period of time in the vaccinated groups (6 weeks) than in the contr
ol group (12 weeks). Thus, the DNA vaccine raised both neutralizing an
tibody and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses and provided some attenuat
ion of the acute phase of infection, but it did not prevent the loss o
f CD4(+) cells.