Sr. Thomson et al., PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF MULTIPLE PENETRATING INJURIES TO THE COLON - FURTHER SUPPORT FOR PRIMARY CLOSURE, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 41(1), 1996, pp. 20-24
Solitary colon injuries are being increasingly managed by intraperiton
eal primary closure. The optimal management of the colon wound in mult
iple injuries of the colon, which have a high mortality, has not been
determined. From 1983-1989, 668 patients sustained colonic injuries. I
n 71 of these patients the colon was injured at more than one site. Of
the 597 single injuries to the colon, 472 (79%) were due to stabs and
102 (17%) to gunshot wounds. Sixty-eight men and three women sustaine
d injuries at more than one site in the large intestine. The median ag
e of patients was 26 years (range 13-66). In 61 patients the colon was
injured at two sites and in seven patients at three sites. Three pati
ents had more than three sites injured. The injuries were inflicted by
: gunshots 35 (49%); stabs, 30 (42%); shotguns, three; and blunt traum
a, three. Forty-one patients were treated by intraperitoneal primary c
losure (IPC) and 30 by a colostomy procedure or exteriorization of the
primarily sutured colon (EPSC). Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (P
ATI) scores were high at 32 +/- 6 and were similar for all methods of
colon wound management. Twenty-four patients were suffering from shock
on admission, 13 of those patients were treated by primary repair and
11 were treated by an exteriorization procedure. Individuals treated
by an exteriorization procedure stayed in hospital significantly longe
r, 45 days versus 21 days (P < 0.004) and had a higher mortality rate,
five deaths versus one death (P < 0.04) than those patients who were
primarily repaired. Intraperitoneal primary closure of all wounds is t
he method of choice for the majority of multiple injuries. Colostomy p
rocedures or EPSC contribute to morbidity and mortality.