GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTEREMIA IN OPEN-HEART-SURGERY PATIENTS TRACED TO PROBABLE TAP-WATER CONTAMINATION OF PRESSURE-MONITORING EQUIPMENT

Citation
Jr. Rudnick et al., GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTEREMIA IN OPEN-HEART-SURGERY PATIENTS TRACED TO PROBABLE TAP-WATER CONTAMINATION OF PRESSURE-MONITORING EQUIPMENT, Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 17(5), 1996, pp. 281-285
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
0899823X
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
281 - 285
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-823X(1996)17:5<281:GBIOPT>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cause(s) of an outbreak of gram-negative b acteremia (GNB) in open-heart-surgery (OHS) patients at hospital A. DE SIGN: Case-control and cohort studies and an environmental survey. RES ULTS: Nine patients developed GNB with Enterobacter cloacae (6), Pseud omonas aerugi;nosa (5), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3), Serratia marcescens (2), or Klebsiella oxytoca (1) following OHS; five of nine patients h ad polymicrobial bacteremia. When the GNB patients were compared with randomly selected OHS patients, having had the first procedure of the day (8 of 9 versus 12 of 27, P=.02), longer cardiopulmonary bypass (me dian, 122 versus 83 minutes, P=.01) or cross-clamp times (median, 75 v ersus 42 minutes, P=.008), intraoperative dopamine infusion (9 of 9 ve rsus 15 of 27, P=.01), or exposure to scrub nurse 6 (6 of 9 versus 4 o f 27, P=.001) were identified as risk factors. When stratified by leng th of the procedure, only being the first procedure of the day and exp osure to scrub nurse 6 remained significant. First procedures used pre ssure-monitoring equipment that was assembled before surgery and left open and uncovered overnight in the operating room, whereas other proc edures used pressure-monitoring equipment assembled immediately before the procedure. At night, operating rooms were cleaned by maintenance personnel who used a disinfectant-water solution sprayed through a hos e connected to an automatic diluting system. Observation of the use of this hose documented that this solution could have contacted and ente red uncovered pressure-monitoring equipment left in the operating room . Water samples from the hose revealed no disinfectant, but grew P aer uginosa. The outbreak was terminated by setting up pressure-monitoring equipment immediately before the procedure and discontinuing use of t he hose-disinfectant system. CONCLUSIONS: This outbreak most likely re sulted from contamination of uncovered preassembled pressure-monitorin g equipment by water from a malfunctioning spray disinfectant device. Pressure-monitoring equipment should be assembled immediately before u se and protected from possible environmental contamination (Infect Con trol Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:281-285).