The rhetorical strategies of the direct action AIDS organization, ACT
UP, are analyzed using Kenneth Burke's concept of the comic frame. Com
mentators have criticized ACT UP for its rude, angry, irreverent, and
indecorous demonstrations. The group's actions reflect the immediate d
anger of AIDS-related sickness and death that many ACT UP protesters f
ace; they also reflect the group's reliance on the comic frame as a wa
y of contending with the onus of being named the scapegoats for introd
ucing AIDS to the United states. In contrast to the prevailing tragic
frame, comic rhetoric is hopeful and humane because it invites reconci
liation and affirms the importance of rationality and community. ACT U
P's challenge to the prevailing tragic frame of guilt-victimage-redemp
tion-purification was designed to reposition its members as part of th
e community and reframe the AIDS crisis in realistic, humane, and prag
matic terms. The study suggests conditions under which other despised
and oppressed groups may respond after having been scapegoated by soci
ety.