Ra. Tupker et al., INDUCTION OF ATOPIC-DERMATITIS BY INHALATION OF HOUSE-DUST MITE, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 97(5), 1996, pp. 1064-1070
Background: The pathogenetic role of house dust mite in atopic dermati
tis remains controversial. Recent studies have shown that intensive ep
icutaneous contact of house dust mite allergen with premanipulated ski
n may induce dematitis. It is, however, uncertain whether such conditi
ons are met during natural contact with house dust mite. In the past,
allergen inhalation has been suggested to induce exacerbation of atopi
c dermatitis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether dermati
tis could be induced in patients with atopic dermatitis by inhalation
of house dust mite. Methods: Twenty patients with atopic dermatitis un
derwent bronchial provocations with house dust mite. Challenge tests w
ere performed with four concentrations of a standardized house dust mi
te extract in a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled fashion. S
pirometry was performed, and FEV, runs measured before and after each
challenge dose. Changes in severity or localization of itching or eryt
hema were recorded. Results: In nine of 20 patients with atopic dermat
itis bronchial challenge with house dust mite induced unequivocal skin
symptoms after 1.5 to 17 hours. Pruritic erythematous lesions on noni
nvolved sites together with exacerbations of existing lesions were see
n in three patients. Three patients had an exacerbation only, and thre
e other patients had new lesions only. In eight of nine patients with
house dust mite inhalation-induced dermatitis, skin symptoms were prec
eded by an early bronchial reaction. All patients with house dust mite
-induced dermatitis had a history of asthma, and as a group they had a
higher mean blood total IgE la el compared with the ''negative skirt
responders.'' One patient had pruritic erythema on the placebo challen
ge day, without a preceding bronchoconstrictive reaction. The number o
f patients who had a skin response on the house dust mite challenge da
y was significantly higher than the number of patients who had a skin
response on the placebo day (p = 0.011 [Prescott's test]). Conclusions
: The respiratory route may be relevant in the induction and exacerbat
ion of dermatitis in a subset of patients with atopic dermatitis who h
ave early bronchial reactions after house dust mite inhalation, a hist
ory of asthma, and an elevated blood total IgE level. Furthermore, the
se findings suggest a possible causal relationship between bronchial r
eactions and skirt reactions.