Hl. Roediger et Kb. Mcdermott, FALSE PERCEPTIONS OF FALSE MEMORIES, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 22(3), 1996, pp. 814-816
We argue that the preceeding comment by J. J. Freyd and D. H. Gleaves
(1946) on H. L. Roediger and K. B. McDermott's (1995) article contests
claims that we never made. In this reply, we consider and rebut their
arguments, defend our use of the term events, and consider the role o
f relatedness in producing false memories. In proposing a critical exp
eriment intended to illuminate the debate about memory recovery in the
rapy, it is Freyd and Gleaves who generalize directly from a laborator
y experiment to complicated events in therapy. However, our analysis o
f their proposed experiment finds it irrelevant to the development of
false memories, either inside or outside the lab.