Eleven patients with levodopa-related motor fluctuations were scored b
efore and after intranasal apomorphine monotherapy, and the motor resp
onses were compared with those with levodopa/carbidopa in this open-la
bel study. Oral trimethobenzamide was used to prevent apomorphine-indu
ced nausea. Three measures of motor performance were employed: (a) the
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor battery; (b) a
timed hand-tapping test; and (c) the Webster's step-seconds test. The
magnitude of the motor-score improvement after apomorphine administra
tion was very similar to that after the usual doses of levodopa/carbid
opa in the 10 patients completing the study; this was true for all thr
ee outcome measures. A major advantage of apomorphine was the rapid on
set of clinical response, which typically occurred in <10 min, as well
as the ease of administration. Major side effects, beyond those exper
ienced with levodopa/carbidopa, were limited to nausea and vomiting (t
hree patients) and orthostatic hypotension (one patient); however, onl
y a single patient dropped out of the study as a consequence. These re
sults indicate that intranasal apomorphine is effective in rapidly rel
ieving parkinsonian ''off'' states and that, for most patients, trimet
hobenzamide is an effective and well-tolerated antiemetic for use with
apomorphine.