R. Giannico et al., NONSPECIFIC NASAL PROVOCATION IN CHILDREN WITH CHRONIC ALLERGIC RHINITIS, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 6(2), 1996, pp. 110-116
Twenty-three children with chronic allergic rhinitis (Group A) and ele
ven normal non-atopic subjects (group C) were submitted to non-specifi
c nasal provocation tests with histamine (0.03; 0.06; 0.125; 0.25; 0.5
; 1.0; 2.0 and 4.0 mg/ml), and one week later with methacholine (0.025
; 0.1; 0.25, 0.5; 1.0; 2.5; 5.0 and 10.0 mg/ml). Measurements of total
nasal resistance were performed by active anterior rhinomanometry (Be
rger, S.A.) and symptoms were recorded. Challenges were carried out in
the morning with all children in an acclimatized room (25 degrees C/7
7 degrees F). Concentrations of the tested drugs were increasingly ins
tilled and after 5 min were followed by total nasal resistance FEV(1),
and FVC measurements considering as positive those tests in which tot
al nasal resistance had a 100% increase, we observed that both histami
ne and methacholine caused an increase in total nasal resistance as in
stilled drug concentration rose; histamine provocations were significa
ntly more positive among group A than group C patients (91% sensitivit
y, 80.8% positive predictive value). This was not observed with methac
holine (55% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value). In neither pr
ovocation was there correlation between the concentration that induced
a positive response and symptoms. There were no changes in spirometri
c values during the tests. Nasal provocations with histamine and metha
choline are safe and well tolerated. Histamine seems to be more adequa
te for differentiating children with allergic rhinitis from normal con
trols.