G. Jerkiewicz et A. Zolfaghari, DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGY OF THE METAL-UNDERPOTENTIAL-DEPOSITED HYDROGEN-BOND FOR RHODIUM ELECTRODES, Journal of physical chemistry, 100(20), 1996, pp. 8454-8461
Investigation of the underpotential deposition of hydrogen (UPD H) on
Rh electrodes in 0.05, 0.10, and 0.50 M aqueous solutions of H2SO4 in
the 273-343 K temperature range by cyclic voltammetry (CV) demonstrate
s that upon temperature increase the CV profiles shift toward less-pos
itive values. The CV hydrogen adsorption/desorption diagrams are symme
tric with respect to the potential axis, indicating that the UPD H is
a reversible process. Theoretical treatment of the experimental data b
ased on an electrochemical adsorption isotherm allows determination of
the Gibbs free energy of adsorption, Delta G(ads)degrees(H-UPD), as a
function of temperature and the H surface coverage; it varies between
-8 and -18 kJ mol(-1). Temperature dependence of Delta G(ads)degrees(
H-UPD) for a constant surface coverage of the underpotential-deposited
H (H-UPD) allows determination of the standard entropy of adsorption,
Delta S(ads)degrees(H-UPD), which is found to be between -15 and -125
J mol(-1) K-1. Subsequently, Delta H(ads)degrees(H-UPD) is determined
to be between -15 and -52 kT mol(-1). An analysis of the values of De
lta H(ads)degrees(H-UPD) and Delta S(ads)degrees(H-UPD) leads to the c
onclusion that the UPD H is an enthalpy-driven process. Knowledge of D
elta H(ads)degrees(H-UPD) leads to determination of the bond energy be
tween Rh and H-UPD, E(Rh-HUPD) Which is between 230 and 270 kJ mol(-1)
depending on the H-UPD surface coverage (theta(HUPD)). The value of E
(Rh-HUPD) is close to that of the bond energy between Rh and the H che
misorbed from the gas phase (H-chem), E(Rh-Hchem), which equals 255 kJ
mol(-1). Proximity of the magnitude of E(Rh-HUPD) to that of E(Rh-Hch
em) points to a similar binding mechanism of H under the conditions in
volving the presence of the electrified solid/liquid interface. Closen
ess of E(Rh-HUPD) to E(Rh-Hchem) also points to the same adsorption si
te of H-UPD and H-chem indicating that they are strongly embedded in t
he surface lattice of the Rh substrate. Finally, proximity of E(Rh-HUP
D) to E(Rh-Hchem) indicates that H-UPD and H-chem are equivalent surfa
ce species.