B. Swaminathan et al., MOLECULAR SUBTYPING OF NEISSERIA-MENINGITIDIS SEROGROUP-B - COMPARISON OF 5 METHODS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(6), 1996, pp. 1468-1473
In order to compare methods for subtyping Neisseria meningitidis serog
roup B isolates, 96 isolates obtained from various locations in the Un
ited States and northwestern Europe were subtyped by five methods: mon
oclonal antibody (MAb)-based serotyping and serosubtyping, DNA macrore
striction analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilo
cus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE), ribotyping, and PCR-restriction frag
ment length polymorphism of the internally transcribed spacer region o
f the rRNA operon (ITS PCR-RFLP). All N. meningitidis serogroup B isol
ates were typeable by PFGE, MEE, ribotyping, and ITS PCR-RFLP. Only 44
.8% of the isolates were completely typeable (both serotype and serosu
btype determination) by MAb-based serotyping and serosubtyping, 60.4%
of the isolates could be serotyped but not serosubtyped, and 90.6% of
the isolates could be either serotyped or serosubtyped. Simpson's disc
rimination indices of diversity for the methods were as follows: PFGE,
99.7%; MEE, 99.4%; ribotyping, 98.8%; MAb serotyping, 75.8%; MAb sero
typing and/or serosubtyping, 97.5%; and ITS PCR-RFLP, 84.2%. The high
degree of diversity observed by PFGE, MEE, and ribotyping can be expla
ined by the fact that isolates were collected from different geographi
c locations at various times. PFGE, MEE, and ribotyping showed greater
discriminatory abilities than MAb-based serotyping and serosubtyping
or ITS PCR-RFLP.