This article examines the press releases distributed in October, 1992,
by the public relations staffs of the two major party presidential ca
ndidates to determine whether these materials established issue salien
ce for the voters. The study concludes that the public did not engage
in ''media tropic'' behavior, growing to the agenda of the campaigns.
Instead, an active public played a pivotal role in issue ordering, hel
ping to determine the outcome of the presidential election. The study
posits that one reason for increased audience influence is the rise of
marketed media. It also suggests that agenda building involves editor
, marketing department, subsidizers, and audience in a complex, dynami
c, and perhaps cyclical process.