Because fundamental control over the legislative process occurs not on
the floor but in standing committees, and because assignment to impor
tant standing committees increases members' power to control the legis
lative agenda, congressional committee assignments are important in de
termining the political and electoral success of incumbents. Changing
membership patterns of committees over time provide some clues on the
importance of seats on the committees. Using data on committee members
hip for the U.S. Senate for congresses from World War II to the 103d C
ongress, we measure the relative value of seats on Senate committees.
We assume that senators who transfer from one committee to another are
increasing their political and electoral capital. Two different measu
res developed by Bullock and Sprague and Munger are employed to create
an ordering of Senate committee membership prestige. Committee assign
ment allocation processes in the House of Representatives and the Sena
te produce similar, expected rankings of legislator preferences among
seats on standing committees.