Flw. Goodwin et al., LACK OF EFFECT OF DOPAMINE D-2 BLOCKADE ON ETHANOL INTAKE IN SELECTEDAND UNSELECTED STRAINS OF RATS, Alcohol, 13(3), 1996, pp. 273-279
Previous research has suggested that brain catecholamines may be invol
ved in regulating ethanol intake. This study was designed to look more
specifically at dopamine (DA) and whether DA D-2 receptor blockade wi
th the antagonist pimozide would alter ethanol consumption in rats. Su
bjects were male Maudsley Reactive and Wistar rats, the former previou
sly shown to consume larger amounts of ethanol than the latter. Both s
trains were screened for ethanol intake by presentation of ethanol sol
utions (free choice with water) in increasing steps from 2% to 10% (v/
v) on an alternate-day schedule. Following the screening period, anima
ls were switched to a schedule of everyday presentation of the 10% (v/
v) ethanol solution (free choice with water) for 10 baseline days. Ani
mals were then divided into high and low drinking levels according to
whether their mean baseline ethanol intake (g/kg) fell within +/-0.5 S
D of the mean intake of their group (Maudsley Reactives: mean = 2.55 g
/kg, low drinkers <1.63, high drinkers >3.47; Wistars: mean = 2.17 g/k
g, low drinkers <1.53, high drinkers >2.82). The animals were assigned
to one of five treatment groups for 5 subsequent days where they rece
ived IP injections of pimozide (0.08, 0.24, or 0.48 mg/kg), tartaric a
cid, or saline. Following the treatment period, ethanol consumption wa
s recorded for 5 posttreatment days. No significant differences due to
treatment were observed for either intake or preference of ethanol ac
ross treatments, drinking groups, or strains. The results obtained in
the present study suggested that interference in DA neurotransmission
through administration of the D-2 antagonist pimozide does not signifi
cantly alter ethanol consumption in either MR or Wistar animals.