C. Lepailleur et al., WHITE COAT EFFECT IN 35 CONSECUTIVE HYPER TENSIVE PATIENTS - METHOD OF QUANTIFICATION - ROLE OF DOCTOR-PATIENT DIALOG, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 86(4), 1993, pp. 427-433
The << white coat >> effect, an alarm reaction to the presence of a do
ctor, is an important cause of blood pressure variability, the frequen
cy, amplitude and mechanisms of which are only partially understood. I
n order to evaluate these factors, a prospective study was undertaken
in 35 consecutive patients referred for assessment of clinical hyperte
nsion. The alarm reaction was investigated during the consultation, at
the time of interrogation, in periods of silence, in the sitting and
upright positions. Twenty-four to forty-eight measurements (average 36
.8) of the blood pressure and heart rate were performed in each patien
t with a Diasys 200 R monitor. The ambulatory period of 3 to 5 hours a
fter the consultation provided 12 to 24 measurements (average 20.7) wh
ich were considered to be the reference for comparison with the consul
tation period. A total of 2038 measurement were made and analysed. Ana
lysis of variance (GLM) for each patient and for the whole group gave
an assessment of the alarm reaction during the patient-doctor dialogue
and periods of silence with reference to the ambulatory period. Durin
g the ambulatory period, the average and standard deviation for systol
ic pressure were 134 +/- 0.7 mmHg, and for diastolic pressure 93.1 +/-
0.6 mmHg. These pressures were significantly lower than during the tw
o periods of consultation, with and without dialogue (p < 0.0001). Dur
ing the consultation, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure values
were significantly higher during the dialogue than during the periods
of silence (p < 0.0001). During the dialogue, the systolic pressure a
ttained 153.7 +/- 0.7 mmHg and the diastolic pressure : 107.2 +/- 0.6
mmHg. During the periods of silence, the systolic pressure was 139.9 /- 0.8 mmHg and the diastolic pressure: 99.2 +/- 0.6 mmHg. Between the
se periods of dialogue and silence there was a difference in average s
ystolic pressure of 13.8 mmHg and diastolic pressure, of 8 mmHg. This
study shows that the white coat effect can be quantified. It is charac
terised by a significant increase in systolic and diastolic pressures
during the consultation compared with the ambulatory period. In additi
on, this effect is significantly increased during the dialogue with th
e doctor compared with the periods of silence.