LOCOREGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS LOCOREGIONAL COMBINED IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED METASTATIC LIVER-DISEASE OF COLORECTALORIGIN - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
Nj. Lygidakis et al., LOCOREGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS LOCOREGIONAL COMBINED IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED METASTATIC LIVER-DISEASE OF COLORECTALORIGIN - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY, Hepato-gastroenterology, 43(7), 1996, pp. 212-220
Background/Aims: This reports presents the results of a prospective ra
ndomized controlled study, of combined locoregional targeted immuno-ch
emotherapy for treatment of patients with liver metastasis from primar
y colorectal malignancies. Materials and Methods: Forty eight patients
were randomly assigned into one of two groups. Group A (n=15) include
d patients who had post-operatively locoregional chemotherapy and Grou
p B (n=33) included patients who had combined locoregional immuno-chem
otherapy. Results: Statistical analysis shows a clear superiority in.
the survival and responses of patients treated with immuno-chemotherap
y versus chemotherapy alone. Forty five percent of patients in. Group
B are alive with a mean survival of 20.3 months, ranging from 13 to 29
months, as opposed to no survivors from Group A and a mean, survival
of only 9.9 months, ranging from 3.6 to 22.5 months. Additionally, 64%
of the immuno-chemotherapy group had a positive response while only 1
3% of the chemotherapy had such a response. Conclusions: Our data supp
orts the value of combined immuno-chemotherapy as a treatment for adva
nced metastatic liver disease.