The standard paradigm of decision-making asks a fully informed patient
to make independent choices free of coercion. This paradigm is often
insufficient for the dying patient. This article considers this standa
rd, particularly in the case of attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitatio
n, its alternatives, and the role of advance directives and surrogate
decision-makers for patients who have lost their decision-making capac
ities. The ethical concerts of therapeutic privilege, voluntary active
euthanasia, as well as principle of double effect, futility, and just
ice are reviewed as they apply to care of the dying patient.