F. Hofgartner et al., DO MOBILE CELLULAR PHONES IN THE EUROPEAN C-NET AND D-NET POSE A POTENTIAL RISK TO PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTED CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 121(20), 1996, pp. 646-652
Objective: To investigate prospectively the extent of potentially harm
ful interference of cardiac pacemakers by mobile phones in the C (anal
og) and D (digital) networks in use in Germany. Patients and methods:
104 patients (54 men, 50 women; mean age 75.8 [40-100] years) with 58
different implanted pacemaker models (43 one-chamber and 15 two-chambe
r systems) underwent uniform tests at various functional states with t
hree different telephones (D1 portable 8 Watt, D1 Handy model 2 Watt,
C Handy model 0.5 Watt). The distances between telephone aerial and pa
cemaker, as well as reception sensitivity and polarity of the pacemake
r were varied. All tests were done during continuous ECG monitoring. R
esults: 28 different pacemaker types (48.3%) in 43 patients (41.3%) sh
owed interference in the form of pacemaker inhibition and switching to
interference frequencies as well as triggering of pacemaker-mediated
tachycardias in the DDD mode, as well as in the temperature-regulated
frequency-adaptive function. D portables influenced pacemaker function
more often and at greater distance than the D Handy model, which was
little different from the c network hand phone. Reduction in pacemaker
sensitivity as well as switching to bipolar reception only partly eli
minated the interference. Conclusions: Patients with implanted pacemak
ers should if possible not use mobile phones in the C and D networks.
Individual testing with suitable programming of pacemaker sensitivity
and polarity can reduce the risk of interference.