The disintegration of the military power Soviet Union, which once thre
atened many parts of the world, is an event of epoch-making significan
ce. There has been little appreciation of the - historically exception
al - fact that the dissolution of this vast empire has so far taken pl
ace without any massive use Of force. One of the reasons for this is p
robably the Community of Independent States (CIS), whose intended purp
ose was to guarantee the performance of essential functions of the atr
ophying USSR. However, expectations that the successor states would un
animously join forces in this Community to sustain above all military
and economic unity have not been fulfilled. In many regions, especiall
y in the Ukraine, it looks as if vital interests such as those of nati
onal security can only be safeguarded against, not with the Russian co
re country. A crucial question now is whether the CIS can still rank i
n any politically significant respect as a substitute for the demised
Soviet Union or whether it is merely a step towards its liquidation in
civilised forms. This leads on to the question of bow the Russian nat
ion which predominated in the former Soviet empire assesses and respon
ds to the new situation. In the following article, a liberally-minded
Russian scientist, Andrei Zagorski, who is Deputy Rector for Research
at the Moscow State Institute for International Relations (MGIMO), exa
mines the development of the CIS. The article is an abridged version o
f a study compiled on behalf of the Federal Institute for Eastern and
International Studies in Cologne.