The interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in anim
als is often claimed to be strongly negative, with species abundance l
imited by energetic requirements. This view has been criticized for a
number of reasons, but is still widely accepted. Here, we provide evid
ence of further fundamental difficulties with this relationship as der
ived from compendium studies. We suggest that there is a potential art
efactual component to these relationships resulting from variation in
the areas over which the densities of species of different body size a
re censused, and differences in the ways species use these areas. Whil
e the interspecific relationship between body size and abundance is st
ill likely to be negative after accounting for the artefactual compone
nt, the slope of the relationship is unlikely to support energetic equ
ivalence arguments.