Js. Haas et al., DISCUSSION OF PREFERENCES FOR LIFE-SUSTAINING CARE BY PERSONS WITH AIDS - PREDICTORS OF FAILURE IN PATIENT-PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION, Archives of internal medicine, 153(10), 1993, pp. 1241-1248
Objectives: To assess the determinants of communication about resuscit
ation between persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) a
nd their physician. Design and Setting: Structured patient interview a
t a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO), an internal med
icine group practice at a private teaching hospital, and an AIDS clini
c at a public hospital. Patients: 289 persons with AIDS. Main Results:
Only 38% of patients had discussed their preferences for resuscitatio
n with their physician. Using logistic regression, we found that patie
nts were less likely to have discussed resuscitation with their physic
ian if they were nonwhite (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence inter
val [CI], 0.24 to 0.99), had never been hospitalized (OR, 0.52; 95% CI
, 0.27 to 0.99), or were cared for in the HMO (OR, 0.44 relative to th
e private teaching hospital; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.82). Patients were more
likely to have discussed their preferences if they were not currently
taking zidovudine (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.03) and if they had de
cided to defer life-sustaining therapy (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.91
). Among nonwhites, those with a nonwhite physician were more likely t
o have discussed resuscitation (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 16.93). Of p
atients who had not discussed their preferences for life-sustaining ca
re, 72% wanted to do so. Patient desire for discussion of this issue d
id not vary by race, severity of illness, hospitalization status, use
of zidovudine, or site of care. Conclusions: A majority of persons wit
h AIDS in this study had not discussed their preferences for life-sust
aining care with their physician, despite the desire to do so. Interve
ntions to improve patient-physician communication about resuscitation
for nonwhites and other groups at risk of inadequate discussion might
lead to clinical decisions that are more consistent with patient prefe
rences.