V. Abraham et al., COMPARISON OF DECISION METHODS TO INITIATE FUNGICIDE APPLICATIONS AGAINST CERCOSPORA BLIGHT OF CARROT, Phytoprotection, 76(3), 1995, pp. 91-99
In 1991 and 1992, two thresholds of a forecasting model were compared
with two other decision methods for effectiveness in timing the first
fungicide application against Cercospora blight of carrot induced by C
ercospora carotae. The first fungicide application was made when : 1)
the plants reached 15 cm in height (conventional method); 2) the inter
mediate (middle) leaves of 50% of the plants were diseased (50% diseas
e incidence threshold method); 3) the cumulative infection equivalence
(CIE) was 14(forecasting model CIE 14); and 4) the CIE was 18 (foreca
sting model CIE 18). In all four treatments, subsequent applications o
f fungicide were made at 10-d intervals when there was no rain, and at
7-d intervals when there was rain. The CIE was calculated based on du
ration of leaf wetness and temperature during the wet period, correcte
d for high humidity and interrupted wet periods, and was cumulative st
arting at crop emergence. For thresholds of CIE 14 and CIE 18, no yiel
d losses were observed and the total number of fungicide applications
needed was lower compared to conventional and 50% disease incidence th
reshold methods. In a separate study, the CIE thresholds were related
to the percentage of commercial fields that reached disease incidence
thresholds of 50, 80 and 100% to establish low risk (CIE 11-15) and hi
gh risk (CIE 16-20) thresholds. The forecasting of low and high risk C
IE thresholds were too late for 3 and 19% of the commercial fields bec
ause those fields had more than 50 and 80% of the plants diseased, res
pectively.