COMPARISON OF DECISION METHODS TO INITIATE FUNGICIDE APPLICATIONS AGAINST CERCOSPORA BLIGHT OF CARROT

Citation
V. Abraham et al., COMPARISON OF DECISION METHODS TO INITIATE FUNGICIDE APPLICATIONS AGAINST CERCOSPORA BLIGHT OF CARROT, Phytoprotection, 76(3), 1995, pp. 91-99
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00319511
Volume
76
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
91 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9511(1995)76:3<91:CODMTI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
In 1991 and 1992, two thresholds of a forecasting model were compared with two other decision methods for effectiveness in timing the first fungicide application against Cercospora blight of carrot induced by C ercospora carotae. The first fungicide application was made when : 1) the plants reached 15 cm in height (conventional method); 2) the inter mediate (middle) leaves of 50% of the plants were diseased (50% diseas e incidence threshold method); 3) the cumulative infection equivalence (CIE) was 14(forecasting model CIE 14); and 4) the CIE was 18 (foreca sting model CIE 18). In all four treatments, subsequent applications o f fungicide were made at 10-d intervals when there was no rain, and at 7-d intervals when there was rain. The CIE was calculated based on du ration of leaf wetness and temperature during the wet period, correcte d for high humidity and interrupted wet periods, and was cumulative st arting at crop emergence. For thresholds of CIE 14 and CIE 18, no yiel d losses were observed and the total number of fungicide applications needed was lower compared to conventional and 50% disease incidence th reshold methods. In a separate study, the CIE thresholds were related to the percentage of commercial fields that reached disease incidence thresholds of 50, 80 and 100% to establish low risk (CIE 11-15) and hi gh risk (CIE 16-20) thresholds. The forecasting of low and high risk C IE thresholds were too late for 3 and 19% of the commercial fields bec ause those fields had more than 50 and 80% of the plants diseased, res pectively.