Subclavian percutaneous access with reservoir placement has been shown
to be difficult or contraindicated in some patients. Of 465 cancer pa
tients who required a port placement between January 1992 to January 1
995, 41 (8.8%) had alternative percutaneous femoral access with a tota
lly implantable port reservoir located in the abdomen because of the i
naccessibility to subclavian or jugular veins and/or the presence of m
assive cutaneous metastases or severe radiodermitis in the upper part
of the torso. Overall implant days was 9880, with an average of 241 da
ys (range: 65-445). Ports were alternatively used for chemotherapy and
nutritional purposes in 11 of 41 patients. Late morbidity causing the
removal of the implanted ports was observed in two of 41 (4.9%) and i
n 25 of 424 (5.9%) patients in the femoral and subclavian series, resp
ectively (P = 0.86). The femoral percutaneous access for totally impla
ntable port devices appears to be a safe alternative for cancer patien
ts when subclavian and/or jugular vein catheterization and reservoir i
n the upper part of the torso is contraindicated.