In 1981 S. W. Hawking and J. Hartle presented a quantum mechanical des
cription of the early stages of possible cosmological evolution. Their
proposal was interpreted by many authors as a pattern of cosmic creat
ion from nothing in which no divine Creator is needed. In this approac
h, physically defined ''nothing'' was identified both with the empty s
et of set theory and with metaphysical nothingness. After defining phi
losophical presuppositions implicitly assumed in Hawking's paper, one
discovers that this alleged nothingness has all properties of the phil
osophically conceived Logos accepted by Hellenic philosophers of the N
eoplatonic tradition. Consequently, Hawking's theory of creation remai
ns consistent with Christian theism, and its only theological opponent
s can be found among defenders of Samuel Clark's God of scientific gap
s.