C. Ip et al., THE EFFICACY OF CONJUGATED LINOLEIC-ACID IN MAMMARY-CANCER PREVENTIONIS INDEPENDENT OF THE LEVEL OR TYPE OF FAT IN THE DIET, Carcinogenesis, 17(5), 1996, pp. 1045-1050
The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the anti
carcinogenic activity of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is affected by
the amount and composition of dietary fat consumed by the host, Becau
se the anticancer agent of interest is a fatty acid, this approach may
provide some insight into its mechanism of action, depending on the o
utcome of these fat feeding experiments, For the fat level experiment,
a custom formulated fat blend was used that simulates the fatty acid
composition of the US diet, This fat blend was present at 10, 13.3, 16
.7 or 20% by weight in the diet. For the fat type experiment, a 20% (w
/w) fat diet containing either corn oil (exclusively) or lard (predomi
nantly) was used, Mammary cancer prevention by CLA was evaluated using
the rat dimethylbenz[a]anthracene model, The results indicated that t
he magnitude of tumor inhibition by 1% CLA was not influenced by the l
evel or type of fat in the diet, It should be noted that these fat die
ts varied markedly in their content of linoleate. Fatty acid analysis
showed that CLA was incorporated predominantly in mammary tissue neutr
al lipids, while the increase in CLA in mammary tissue phospholipids w
as minimal, Furthermore, there was no evidence that CLA supplementatio
n perturbed the distribution of linoleate or other fatty acids in the
phospholipid fraction, Collectively these carcinogenesis and biochemic
al data suggest that the cancer preventive activity of CLA is unlikely
to be mediated by interference with the metabolic cascade involved in
converting linoleic acid to eicosanoids. The hypothesis that CLA migh
t act as an antioxidant was also examined, Treatment with CLA resulted
in lower levels of mammary tissue malondialdehyde (an end product of
lipid peroxidation), but failed to change the levels of 8-hydroxydeoxy
guanosine (a marker of oxidatively damaged DNA), Thus while CLA may ha
ve some antioxidant function in vivo in suppressing lipid peroxidation
, its anticarcinogenic activity cannot be accounted for by protecting
the target cell DNA against oxidative damage, The finding that the inh
ibitory effect of CLA maximized at 1% (regardless of the availability
of linoleate in the diet) could conceivably point to a limiting step i
n the capacity to metabolize CLA to some active product(s) which is es
sential for cancer prevention.