THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF FALSE CONFESSIONS - COMPLIANCE, INTERNALIZATION, AND CONFABULATION

Citation
Sm. Kassin et Kl. Kiechel, THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF FALSE CONFESSIONS - COMPLIANCE, INTERNALIZATION, AND CONFABULATION, Psychological science, 7(3), 1996, pp. 125-128
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09567976
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
125 - 128
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-7976(1996)7:3<125:TSOFC->2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
An experiment demonstrated that false incriminating evidence can lead people to accept guilt for a clime they did riot commit. Subjects in a fast- or slow-paced reaction time task were accused of damaging a com puter by pressing the wrong key. All were truly innocent and initially denied the charge. A confederate then said she saw the subject hit th e key or did not see the subject hit the key. Compared with subjects i n the slow-pace/no-witness group, those in the fast-pace/witness group were more likely to sign a confession, internalize guilt for the even t, and confabulate details in memory consistent with that belief. Both legal and conceptual implications are discussed.