PRESENTATION FORMAT IN ANALOG STUDIES - EFFECTS ON PARTICIPANTS EVALUATIONS

Citation
Me. Johnson et al., PRESENTATION FORMAT IN ANALOG STUDIES - EFFECTS ON PARTICIPANTS EVALUATIONS, The Journal of psychology, 130(3), 1996, pp. 341-349
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223980
Volume
130
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
341 - 349
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3980(1996)130:3<341:PFIAS->2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Whether presentation format (video, audio, written transcript, or writ ten transcript with photograph) affects participants' responses to cou nseling scenarios in an analogue study was examined. After watching a brief counseling session presented in one of four formats, 131 partici pants completed three instruments measuring counselor credibility and expectations. Results revealed significant differences among the forma ts on the Counselor Rating Form (CRF-S; Corrigan & Schmidt, 1983) Trus tworthiness and Expertness Scales, with transcripts with pictures rate d the highest (higher than videotape and audiotape) and transcripts wi thout pictures rated second highest (higher than video). No significan t differences between the presentation formats were revealed on the Ex pectations about Counseling Questionnaire (EAC; Tinsley, Workman, & Ka ss, 1980) or 15 Personal Problem Inventory (15PPI; Cash, Begley, McCow n, & Weise, 1975). Results suggest that studies using different format s with the CRF-S are not necessarily comparable and that the four type s of analogue approaches may not be interchangeable.