RESECTION MARGINS OF 2 VERSUS 5 CM FOR CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA WITH A TUMOR THICKNESS OF 0.8 TO 2.0 MM - A RANDOMIZED STUDY BY THE SWEDISH MELANOMA STUDY-GROUP
U. Ringborg et al., RESECTION MARGINS OF 2 VERSUS 5 CM FOR CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA WITH A TUMOR THICKNESS OF 0.8 TO 2.0 MM - A RANDOMIZED STUDY BY THE SWEDISH MELANOMA STUDY-GROUP, Cancer, 77(9), 1996, pp. 1809-1814
BACKGROUND. The traditional surgical treatment for primary malignant m
elanoma has often been a wide excision with a margin of about 5 cm. Si
nce the risk of local recurrences is dependent on tumor thickness, thi
n tumors (<1 mm) have routinely been excised with a narrow margin. For
thick tumors, the optimal resection margin is controversial, and can
be determined only by prospective, randomized trials. METHODS. The Swe
dish Melanoma Study Group performed a prospective, randomized multicen
ter study to evaluate an excision margin of 2 versus 5 cm for patients
with cutaneous malignant melanoma with tumor thickness > 0.8 and less
than or equal to 2.0 mm. The trial includes 769 patients. Patients wi
th melanomas of the skin of the head, neck, hands, feet, or vulva were
not included in the trial. In the event of an excision biopsy for dia
gnosis, radical surgery was completed within 6 weeks. The median follo
w-up time was 5.8 years for estimation of survival and 4.0 years for d
iagnosis of recurrent disease. RESULTS, No significant differences hav
e been observed between the treatment groups regarding local or region
al recurrences or survival. CONCLUSIONS, We recommend an excision with
a margin of 2 cm for cutaneous malignant melanoma with a tumor thickn
ess > 0.8 and less than or equal to 2.0 mm. (C) 1996 American Cancer S
ociety.