Ge. Hofmann et al., INTRAOBSERVER, INTEROBSERVER VARIATION OF SPERM CRITICAL MORPHOLOGY -COMPARISON OF EXAMINER AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED ANALYSIS, Fertility and sterility, 65(5), 1996, pp. 1021-1025
Objective: To examine intraobservational and interobservational variat
ion in sperm critical morphology analysis between trained andrologists
and a computer over the range of 0% to 15% normal forms. Design: Retr
ospective. Setting: Fertility center. Patients: Twenty-four semen spec
imen slides were read five times in a randomized, blinded fashion by t
wo andrologists and a computerized semen analyzer. Twenty-five samples
were analyzed using a different stain and a centrifugation step. Main
Outcome Measure: Sperm strict morphology. Results: Mean average intra
observer deviation of normal forms was small (1.3% to 2.7%). Intraobse
rver deviation did not differ between andrologists, but both differed
from the computer. Interobserver variation for percent normal forms wa
s similar for andrologists and computer. Mean average deviations were
small over the entire range of normal forms (<3%), there were no diffe
rences between examiners, and the variation was independent of the ini
tial percent normal forms. The computer frequently evaluated significa
ntly fewer cells than the andrologists. Updated software increased the
number of cells read by the computer requiring more time than the and
rologist. Conclusions: Trained andrologists and a computer determine s
perm critical morphology similarly over the range of 0% to 15% normal
forms. A single evaluation is highly predictive of multiple evaluation
s. Improvements in the speed of computer assessment are still necessar
y.