H. Fisch et Et. Goluboff, GEOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS IN SPERM COUNTS - A POTENTIAL CAUSE OF BIAS IN STUDIES OF SEMEN QUALITY, Fertility and sterility, 65(5), 1996, pp. 1044-1046
Objective: To determine whether geographic variations in sperm counts
might bias conclusions drawn from studies of semen quality. Design: Re
analysis of published data from a meta-analysis of 61 studies from 193
8 to 1990 that concluded a worldwide decline in semen quality over the
last 50 years. Main Outcome Measures: Influence of geographic locatio
n on sperm counts. Results: Of 61 studies in the meta-analysis, only 2
0 included greater than or equal to 100 men. These 20 studies collecti
vely comprised 91% of the total men studied. We focused our reanalysis
on these 20 studies. Of the studies before 1970, all were from the Un
ited States and 80% were from New York. These studies represented loca
tions with the highest sperm counts, In contrast, after 1970, 80% of t
he studies were from locations not represented earlier, including five
studies from third world countries, where sperm counts were low. Conc
lusions: Sperm counts vary dramatically among different geographic loc
ations. Geographic variations in sperm counts need to be considered wh
en analyzing data from different locations.