Cm. Callahan et al., PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING FOR LATE-LIFE DEPRESSION, Journal of general internal medicine, 11(4), 1996, pp. 218-225
OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision maki
ng regarding late-life depression. DESIGN: Longitudinal collection of
data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and con
tent of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical t
rial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of
late-life depression. SETTING: Academic primary care group practice. P
ATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians w
ho completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical ass
essments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patien
ts who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires
. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention physicians were provided with their pati
ent's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patien
t-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionn
aire regarding their clinical assessment. MAIN RESULTS: Those physicia
ns not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patient
s as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians re
garding their clinical assessments, A physician's clinical rating of l
ikely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of tre
atment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were fa
cilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was rece
ived by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to tr
eat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patien
t doubts about treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of
depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treat
ment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did n
ot consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatmen
t decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients a
nd physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and
how accurately they make these judgments.