J. Singh et al., HEPATOTOXICITY DUE TO ANTITUBERCULOSIS THERAPY - CLINICAL PROFILE ANDREINTRODUCTION OF THERAPY, Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 22(3), 1996, pp. 211-214
The clinical profile of antituberculosis treatment (ATT)-induced hepat
otoxicity is variable, and the reintroduction of ATT in patients who h
ave developed such injury is controversial. We conducted a prospective
study to determine the clinical profile in patients with ATT-induced
hepatotoxicity and to test a predefined strategy of reintroduction of
ATT. Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinical evidence of ATT-in
duced hepatotoxicity were included. Jaundice was the presenting sympto
m in 44 (61%) patients; prodromal symptoms were present in 28 (39%). S
erious complications developed in 12 (16.6%) patients (fulminant hepat
ic failure in seven, subacute hepatic failure in four, hepatic encepha
lopathy in one). Nine patients (three males, six females) died from th
ese complications. The mean duration of treatment before the onset of
hepatitis was significantly longer in the group that died (53.22 +/- 3
6.22 days) than in the rest of the patients (31.07 +/- 30.30 days; p <
0.01). Malnutrition was present in 37 of the 72 patients. After resol
ution of drug induced hepatitis, reintroduction of isoniazid and rifam
picin was possible in 41 of 44 patients. Thus, our results showed that
ATT-induced hepatitis carried significant morbidity and mortality, th
at malnutrition was common in patients with ATT-related hepatitis, and
that potentially hepatotoxic antituberculosis agents could be safely
reintroduced after recovery from hepatitis.