ACUTE FRACTURE OF THE DISTAL TIBIAL PHYSIS - ROLE OF GRADIENT-ECHO MR-IMAGING VERSUS PLAIN FILM EXAMINATION

Citation
P. Petit et al., ACUTE FRACTURE OF THE DISTAL TIBIAL PHYSIS - ROLE OF GRADIENT-ECHO MR-IMAGING VERSUS PLAIN FILM EXAMINATION, American journal of roentgenology, 166(5), 1996, pp. 1203-1206
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
0361803X
Volume
166
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1203 - 1206
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(1996)166:5<1203:AFOTDT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Recent reports indicate that, compared with MR imaging, pla in film radiography often underestimates the extent of injury in child ren with physeal fracture-separation. Such underestimation may have si gnificant therapeutic and prognostic outcomes. We performed this study to assess the benefit of MR imaging compared with plain film radiogra phy in the diagnosis and immediate treatment of acute fractures of the distal tibial physis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-nine patients with acute fractures, including 15 Salter-Harris II, four Salter-Harris II I, four Salter-Harris IV, and six triplane fractures, were prospective ly examined by MR imaging with gradient-echo sequences, The MR images were compared with plain film radiographs. All cases were reviewed in a blind fashion by two experienced radiologists to determine the Salte r-Harris classification on the basis of first plain film radiographs a nd then MR images, Two experienced pediatric surgeons were asked to pr opose treatment on the basis of first plain film radiographs and then MR images, Both the radiologists and the surgeons were asked to rate t he two techniques in terms of degree of confidence and overall diagnos tic effectiveness. RESULTS. Only 1 of 29 fractures (3%) was misclassif ied by plain film radiography. MR imaging never caused the treatment p lan to be modified. However, the position of fracture fragments in Sal ter-Harris IV and triplane fractures was always better appreciated on MR images, facilitating more accurate surgical treatment. Except for t hose in the misclassified fracture, all other fracture lines were seen on both plain film radiographs and MR images but were more easily see n on MR images. CONCLUSION. Gradient-echo MR imaging allowed easier as sessment of fracture lines than did plain film radiography, but the la tter technique remains the primary means of evaluating epiphyseal inju ries. For acute fractures of the lower extremity of the tibia, gradien t-echo MR imaging should be limited to complex fractures and to cases in which the classification of a fracture on the basis of plain film e valuation is uncertain.