K. Pernezny et al., LOSSES IN FRESH-MARKET TOMATO PRODUCTION IN FLORIDA DUE TO TARGET SPOT AND BACTERIAL SPOT AND THE BENEFITS OF PROTECTANT FUNGICIDES, Plant disease, 80(5), 1996, pp. 559-563
Three large-scale field tests were conducted under commercial growing
conditions in southwestern Florida to quantify yield losses associated
with foliar diseases of fresh-market tomatoes, document the benefits
of protectant fungicides, and establish a protocol to be used in makin
g yield-loss assessments for fresh-market tomatoes. The benefits of pr
otectant fungicides were amply demonstrated in two of three experiment
s. Marketable and extra-large fruit yields were reduced 30 and 43% in
these tests, respectively, when no fungicides were used. Net returns o
n investment were $7,800 to $14,800/ha greater in plots treated with c
hlorothalonil than in control plots. Much of the loss in marketable yi
eld was due to direct damage to fruit by the target spot fungus. As mu
ch as two-thirds of the fruit had to be discarded in no-spray plots be
cause of blemishes from target spot. Tank-mix sprays of copper-mancoze
b provided good early season control of bacterial spot, but there was
no correlation between bacterial spot damage levels and yield or monet
ary losses. Little return on investment in protectant fungicides was r
ecorded where target spot was not a factor in the third experiment, ev
en though low to moderate levels of bacterial spot were present.